Destroyed With Facts and Logic
The popular atheist case against religion was already shallow, and the same habits carried straight over to feminism.
The popular atheist case against religion was already shallow, and the same habits carried straight over to feminism.
There is a move in a conversation that doesn’t win the argument but ends it. In American constitutional debate, it has become the default. This is an essay about what that costs — not about guns.
The problem is not questions. It is the question with a cause already inside it — a post hoc inference the speaker never performs, so it can never be pinned on them.
Our intuitions quietly give up somewhere past a few thousand. Here is what a billion actually looks like.
Nine years ago, I wrote that search engines look for relevance, not truth. The box answers you directly now, and the problem didn’t go away — it got quieter.
We already refuse to farm our most vulnerable. Consistency asks us to mean it.
You have probably encountered this slogan in an online debate, usually deployed with the air of someone…